At our think tank we often look at the future and the ramifications. We are about to change the normal evolution of our species, which makes it better for the world we live, our technically advanced work and the worlds we may reside in the future - off world civilizations in room, other planets and moons. It's inevitable, but is it directly to do? A few talk.
One fellow thinker wrote an email to me about this topic and states; "I understand your views on humans and our frailty and weakness when i ponder the question of are we ready to determine direction in areas such as boosting our IQ, Robotic work forces, Utopian values, medical advancement to the point of eliminating "dysfunctional" family genes or any altering of our genetic makeup, and so on... "
Good points to ponder indeed and I actually guess the real problem in all of this is that adversity develops character, and the human being mind and will Noocube Customer Reviews can overcome all, those who fight on against the odds have the most character. I suppose the movie Gatica best demonstrates point. I've never been defeated by anyone who didn't have a huge benefit, nor anyone equal to me. But I've defeated most all of them. Why? You don't have to be better - Will - Strength of Character are so much higher.
We should be teaching will of the mind, strength of figure, wisdom, reasoning, thinking, creativeness. Those would be the great equalizers. IQ is merely ONE element, don't get me incorrect it's one of the very most important, but I'd trade it for Will, if I had to choose, thankfully, I actually don't. Perfection is over rated. I don't want ever tree of every species to check the same, all the branches coming out in the same place, like a giant Mathematica Fractal. I don't want all people to check the same, the uniqueness, should be celebrated, good results . all that said higher IQ would be an benefit, even if there will always be weak people.
My fellow thinker also discusses another challenge, regarding know-it-all technocrats who won't admit that prediction and decision making in complicated chaotic systems usually ends in disaster and he states; "
I question a world society for making decisions such as these while we still are strife with war, slavery, discrimination, my way or the highway mentality, and so forth... "
To that We would reply; good and you should because Freedom and Liberty and choice are the best way to run human society. Despite, exactly what is told by those who feel that elite right to choose for everyone more. Adam Smith would agree. If a World Community agrees to freedom and liberty that would enhance the lives of billions of humans - great, however, somehow, I don't see that playing out very well, considering those who'd be running things could have absolute power, we really know what happens next.